Unfair marketing becomes a criminal offence next week

debbidoo

Free Member
Apr 10, 2008
1,799
569
Gwynedd
I think this will be a tough one to police... wonder how many convictions will come of it? It seems to me that "posing as a customer" is a bit of a cloudy area.

I mean, if you're on a forum and someone says "I'm looking for Product X" and you sell Product X, if you tell the OP "Oh, you can buy Product X at this site" - you're not posing as a customer, but then again you're not admitting that you own the site. However, what you *are* doing is being helpful by telling someone where they can find what they're looking for, so chances are they're not going to be too miffed at you.

I'd love some clarification on this... anyone?
 
Upvote 0
PART 2
PROHIBITIONS
Prohibition of unfair commercial practices
3.
—(1) Unfair commercial practices are prohibited.
(2)
Paragraphs (3) and (4) set out the circumstances when a commercial practice is unfair.
(3)
A commercial practice is unfair if—
(a)
it contravenes the requirements of professional diligence; and
(b)
it materially distorts or is likely to materially distort the economic behaviour of the average consumer with regard to the product.
(4)
A commercial practice is unfair if—
(a)
it is a misleading action under the provisions of regulation 5;
(b)
it is a misleading omission under the provisions of regulation 6;
(c)
it is aggressive under the provisions of regulation 7; or
(d)
it is listed in Schedule 1.
Prohibition of the promotion of unfair commercial practices
4.
The promotion of any unfair commercial practice by a code owner in a code of conduct is prohibited.
Misleading actions
5.
—(1) A commercial practice is a misleading action if it satisfies the conditions in either paragraph (2) or paragraph (3).
(2)
A commercial practice satisfies the conditions of this paragraph—
(a)
if it contains false information and is therefore untruthful in relation to any of the matters in paragraph (4) or if it or its overall presentation in any way deceives or is likely to deceive the average consumer in relation to any of the matters in that paragraph, even if the information is factually correct; and
(b)
it causes or is likely to cause the average consumer to take a transactional decision he would not have taken otherwise.
(3)
A commercial practice satisfies the conditions of this paragraph if—
(a)
it concerns any marketing of a product (including comparative advertising) which creates confusion with any products, trade marks, trade names or other distinguishing marks of a competitor; or
(b)
it concerns any failure by a trader to comply with a commitment contained in a code of conduct which the trader has undertaken to comply with, if—
(i)
the trader indicates in a commercial practice that he is bound by that code of conduct, and
(ii)
the commitment is firm and capable of being verified and is not aspirational, 3
and it causes or is likely to cause the average consumer to take a transactional decision he would not have taken otherwise, taking account of its factual context and of all its features and circumstances.
(4)
The matters referred to in paragraph (2)(a) are—
(a)
the existence or nature of the product;
(b)
the main characteristics of the product (as defined in paragraph 5);
(c)
the extent of the trader’s commitments;
(d)
the motives for the commercial practice;
(e)
the nature of the sales process;
(f)
any statement or symbol relating to direct or indirect sponsorship or approval of the trader or the product;
(g)
the price or the manner in which the price is calculated;
(h)
the existence of a specific price advantage;
(i)
the need for a service, part, replacement or repair;
(j)
the nature, attributes and rights of the trader (as defined in paragraph 6);
(k)
the consumer’s rights or the risks he may face.
(5)
In paragraph (4)(b), the “main characteristics of the product” include—
(a)
availability of the product;
(b)
benefits of the product;
(c)
risks of the product;
(d)
execution of the product;
(e)
composition of the product;
(f)
accessories of the product;
(g)
after-sale customer assistance concerning the product;
(h)
the handling of complaints about the product;
(i)
the method and date of manufacture of the product;
(j)
the method and date of provision of the product;
(k)
delivery of the product;
(l)
fitness for purpose of the product;
(m)
usage of the product;
(n)
quantity of the product;
(o)
specification of the product;
(p)
geographical or commercial origin of the product;
(q)
results to be expected from use of the product; and
(r)
results and material features of tests or checks carried out on the product.
(6)
In paragraph (4)(j), the “nature, attributes and rights” as far as concern the trader include the trader’s—
(a)
identity;
(b)
assets;
(c)
qualifications;
(d)
status;
(e)
approval;
(f)
affiliations or connections;
(g)
ownership of industrial, commercial or intellectual property rights; and 4
(h)
awards and distinctions.
(7)
In paragraph (4)(k) “consumer’s rights” include rights the consumer may have under Part 5A of the Sale of Goods Act 1979(a) or Part 1B of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982(b).
Misleading omissions
6.
—(1) A commercial practice is a misleading omission if, in its factual context, taking account of the matters in paragraph (2)—
(a)
the commercial practice omits material information,
(b)
the commercial practice hides material information,
(c)
the commercial practice provides material information in a manner which is unclear, unintelligible, ambiguous or untimely, or
(d)
the commercial practice fails to identify its commercial intent, unless this is already apparent from the context,
and as a result it causes or is likely to cause the average consumer to take a transactional decision he would not have taken otherwise.
(2)
The matters referred to in paragraph (1) are—
(a)
all the features and circumstances of the commercial practice;
(b)
the limitations of the medium used to communicate the commercial practice (including limitations of space or time); and
(c)
where the medium used to communicate the commercial practice imposes limitations of space or time, any measures taken by the trader to make the information available to consumers by other means.
(3)
In paragraph (1) “material information” means—
(a)
the information which the average consumer needs, according to the context, to take an informed transactional decision; and
(b)
any information requirement which applies in relation to a commercial communication as a result of a Community obligation.
(4)
Where a commercial practice is an invitation to purchase, the following information will be material if not already apparent from the context in addition to any other information which is material information under paragraph (3)—
(a)
the main characteristics of the product, to the extent appropriate to the medium by which the invitation to purchase is communicated and the product;
(b)
the identity of the trader, such as his trading name, and the identity of any other trader on whose behalf the trader is acting;
(c)
the geographical address of the trader and the geographical address of any other trader on whose behalf the trader is acting;
(d)
either—
(i)
the price, including any taxes; or
(ii)
where the nature of the product is such that the price cannot reasonably be calculated in advance, the manner in which the price is calculated;
(e)
where appropriate, either—
(i)
all additional freight, delivery or postal charges; or
(ii)
where such charges cannot reasonably be calculated in advance, the fact that such charges may be payable;
(a) 1979 c.54; Part 5A was inserted by S.I. 2002/3045.
(b) 1982 c.29. Part 1B was inserted by S.I.2002/3045. 5
(f)
the following matters where they depart from the requirements of professional diligence—
(i)
arrangements for payment,
(ii)
arrangements for delivery,
(iii)
arrangements for performance,
(iv)
complaint handling policy;
(g)
for products and transactions involving a right of withdrawal or cancellation, the existence of such a right.
Aggressive commercial practices
7.
—(1) A commercial practice is aggressive if, in its factual context, taking account of all of its features and circumstances—
(a)
it significantly impairs or is likely significantly to impair the average consumer’s freedom of choice or conduct in relation to the product concerned through the use of harassment, coercion or undue influence; and
(b)
it thereby causes or is likely to cause him to take a transactional decision he would not have taken otherwise.
(2)
In determining whether a commercial practice uses harassment, coercion or undue influence account shall be taken of—
(a)
its timing, location, nature or persistence;
(b)
the use of threatening or abusive language or behaviour;
(c)
the exploitation by the trader of any specific misfortune or circumstance of such gravity as to impair the consumer’s judgment, of which the trader is aware, to influence the consumer’s decision with regard to the product;
(d)
any onerous or disproportionate non-contractual barrier imposed by the trader where a consumer wishes to exercise rights under the contract, including rights to terminate a contract or to switch to another product or another trader; and
(e)
any threat to take any action which cannot legally be taken.
(3)
In this regulation—
(a)
“coercion” includes the use of physical force; and
(b)
“undue influence” means exploiting a position of power in relation to the consumer so as to apply pressure, even without using or threatening to use physical force, in
 
Upvote 0
You are correct in so far as you have taken it, Moneyman, but the minister will doubtless have leeway on regulations to play with. That's another stack of unnecessary and burdensome paper chasing for those of us who behave fairly, in the finest traditions of this bureaucratic-army-building shower of wasters.
 
Upvote 0
Another piece of crap, for craps sake.

If they want to do anything useful, what about getting stuck into the scammers ?

This is a nonsense bill, and will only cause loads of paperwork (and public sector jobs no doubt), cost loads of our tax, and will produce little or no end result.

Another good waste of ministers time I see. Time we booted them out on their lughole !!
 
Upvote 0
I don't know - big name companies setting up fake "consumer" blogs as "viral marketing" campaigns or spamming forums pretending to be consumers just for the links is widespread.

While I don't think consumers are dumb enough to fall for some of this stuff that stupid marketeers do, it would be nice to have a little legal clout to scare off forum spammers if you run a forum. There are ways around it of course so the real impact might be minimal, but hopefully just the presence of the legislation will encourage marketing agencies to be a bit more careful when using online communities to "promote" their products and services.

4(k) the consumer's rights or the risks he may face.

That could be pretty big in terms of delivering and selling SEO services. Risks are very rarely outlined accurately - how many SEO scare stories do we all read, even just on these forums. People pay for a service and then get banned from Google. That has a huge impact on business and generally SEO companies who do dodgy SEO stuff get around it with legal disclaimers that say stuff like "results include search engines like Lycos....".

(or have I misinterpreted the meaning?)

Scott
 
Upvote 0
The type of marketing agency that practises the sort of underhand stuff you mention don't give a stuff about the law as it stands, and will ignore yet another poorly thought out piece of legislation with no trouble.

The law, as I see it, only keeps the honest man in a bureaucratic nightmare, whilst the less-than-honest just goes ahead and does what he wants.

I could sweep the internet, and catch spammers/scam artists all day long - so why do the authorities not get stuck into something like this?
 
Upvote 0

debbidoo

Free Member
Apr 10, 2008
1,799
569
Gwynedd
It's probably not going to help consumers that much anyway - how many people, honestly now, actually bother getting the hump if someone goes on a forum and says "buy this, it's fab" when they own the company?

It'd be far more useful, if the gov wants to big brother the internet, if they would turn their attention to doing something about online card fraud and child porn instead of introducing a pointless law like this which basically hits small businesses harder than anyone else. How about training police forces to deal with complaints about serious card fraud by doing something other than saying "oh, we never get involved in this stuff" - or even better, put some funding in to set up a dedicated online fraud squad, that was properly trained to understand what it was doing?

Meh.

</rant>
 
Upvote 0
Debbidoos has a good point: who is actually going to enforce this?

The Police? No way. It won't count toward their conviction figures, or if it does they won't allocate several officers, commercially aware and with financial and marketing training, to get a single conviction.
Trading Standards? They are severely underfunded as it is and have a huge choice of far bigger targets.
Office of Fair Trading? One is busy and the other's on maternity leave.

It is, as pointed out above, the work of the lacklustre lawyer MPs of NuLabour: wallpaper; expensive, self justifying, busybody blather.

Thank the Lord they are in their dying throes.
 
Upvote 0
I've just received my copy of the new regulations from BERR and note that clause 6 states:

Falsely stating that a product will only be available for a very limited time, or that it will only be available on particular terms for a very limited time, in order to elicit an immediate decision and deprive consumers of sufficient opportunity or time to make an informed choice.

Does this now mean that when advertising you can no longer use a "call to action"? We have special offer days whereby we offer 20% off normal prices for any quotations given on a particular day and the work must be booked in on that day and completed by a certain date. Is this now illegal?

What exactly is meant by:

Falsely stating that a product will only be available for a very limited time,

Surely this is the whole essence of a good advertising campaign, a "call to action"! Confused! :|
 
Upvote 0
I've just received my copy of the new regulations from BERR and note that clause 6 states:



Does this now mean that when advertising you can no longer use a "call to action"? We have special offer days whereby we offer 20% off normal prices for any quotations given on a particular day and the work must be booked in on that day and completed by a certain date. Is this now illegal?

What exactly is meant by:



Surely this is the whole essence of a good advertising campaign, a "call to action"! Confused! :|
"Falsely" is the key word there.
 
Upvote 0
"Falsely" is the key word there.

What exactly is meant by:

"Falsely stating that a product will only be available for a very limited time,"

I don't understand how you can be falseley stating it if it IS only available for a specified length of time?? Does this mean that all special offers now have to be available ad infinitum?? If so they're not very special are they?? Surely this is the whole essence of a good advertising campaign, a "call to action"! I am still confused!
confused.gif
 
Upvote 0

Tim R-T-C

Free Member
Mar 19, 2008
548
64
The North
What exactly is meant by:

I don't understand how you can be falseley stating it if it IS only available for a specified length of time?? Does this mean that all special offers now have to be available ad infinitum?? If so they're not very special are they?? Surely this is the whole essence of a good advertising campaign, a "call to action"! I am still confused!

The 'Falsely claim' bit means that you cannot tell a customer that product X will only be available at £500 for the next 2 days in order to try and get them to buy it now, when really it will be available at £500 for the foreseeable future.

Seems fair to me, might help to crack down on the high pressure sales tactics, although probably easy to weasel out of by saying that the salesman was unaware that the discount had been extended for a further week by head office (for example).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chippie
Upvote 0
The 'Falsely claim' bit means that you cannot tell a customer that product X will only be available at £500 for the next 2 days in order to try and get them to buy it now, when really it will be available at £500 for the foreseeable future.

Seems fair to me, might help to crack down on the high pressure sales tactics, although probably easy to weasel out of by saying that the salesman was unaware that the discount had been extended for a further week by head office (for example).

Thanks for that Tim. So the scenario I outlined above breaks no rules and calls to action fall outside the scope of this then. Is that how you would interperate this?
 
Upvote 0

Tim R-T-C

Free Member
Mar 19, 2008
548
64
The North
Thanks for that Tim. So the scenario I outlined above breaks no rules and calls to action fall outside the scope of this then. Is that how you would interperate this?


I wouldn't take my advice as legally binding but I would suggest that offering a 20% discount on a 24 hr. response is completely fine. I think they are trying to stop people from seemingly offering discounts when there are none to be had.

No different really to the rules that stop firms from declaring that a product is 20% cheaper now, unless it really has been on sale for the higher price before.
 
Upvote 0
Upvote 0
This is going to be a nightmare to police, especially online. With current software and custom made applications spammers can have websites up in minutes that break all these conditions and in most cases they are untracable.

Hot air!!
 
Upvote 0

Latest Articles

Join UK Business Forums for free business advice