C
cmjim
- Original Poster
- #1
Hi I'm a newbie to the forum.
I am a partner in a small chocolate manufacturer and part of our busines was to sell our products online.
We designed our own website using a basic page builder package and knew we needed a profesional eccommerce site.
We live in a remote area and qualified for a 50 % grant for our website from the local enterprise agency. The enterprise agency recommended a local company (we are are in a rural and remote area with few Web companies operating here) who we approached. They quoted around the maximan grant 3700 which included an eccommerce platform with worldpay, this include a content management system, 8 static pages, shopping basket and a backend mangement system for orders etc.
We thought the company the company quoted in the region as they knew we qualified fot the grant.
Thus being a small start up we looked for a cheaper alternative.
We approached a chap who had moved into our village who we knewran a company with a business partner. He does the programming and his partner graphic/web design.
Our looked the quote and spec and thought it was on the high side and said his company would develop a bespoke system for our business.
Thus the we decided to go with them although no contarct was signed.
They worked on the website to be lauched in time for Christmas sales (end Dec)
Thy siad time was an issue and the site would be basic but we could take the orders and payment was via paypal.
We had a number of complaints from customers regarding the site as many felt it was confusing. We also had issues with paypal.
At the end of December we recieved a invoice for an amount close to 3700 including VAT. They originally ommited the VAT in their original quote. The hosting cost had gone from £25 per annum to £50.
After recieving the bill I discusssed these issues with our neighbour. He said the project had taken them longer and we had only been billed for half the time they had worked on the project. He said the VAT was an error on their part but still sought the payment for it.
HE also said that the project was 2/3 complete.
Iasked about a content management system so that we could update the site our new page etc. He said it wasn't part of the spec and would cost extra. We took this for given and we updated our news on a weekly basis on our old site. He was happy because this was their first eccommrce site aand the experience gained would make it easier when it comes to thier next project.
He also mentioned that their houly rate had gon up from £25 to £30 (+VAT)
previously they had failed to mention VAT as above.
I feel we are paying for their learning curve and they have been unfair. We are held over a barrel as they are hosting our website on their servers. We feel stuck as we can ill afford to go over budget and wary if cost spiral as they encounter more problems with our web site.
Any advice would be graetly appreciated
James
cocoamountain. co. uk
I am a partner in a small chocolate manufacturer and part of our busines was to sell our products online.
We designed our own website using a basic page builder package and knew we needed a profesional eccommerce site.
We live in a remote area and qualified for a 50 % grant for our website from the local enterprise agency. The enterprise agency recommended a local company (we are are in a rural and remote area with few Web companies operating here) who we approached. They quoted around the maximan grant 3700 which included an eccommerce platform with worldpay, this include a content management system, 8 static pages, shopping basket and a backend mangement system for orders etc.
We thought the company the company quoted in the region as they knew we qualified fot the grant.
Thus being a small start up we looked for a cheaper alternative.
We approached a chap who had moved into our village who we knewran a company with a business partner. He does the programming and his partner graphic/web design.
Our looked the quote and spec and thought it was on the high side and said his company would develop a bespoke system for our business.
Thus the we decided to go with them although no contarct was signed.
They worked on the website to be lauched in time for Christmas sales (end Dec)
Thy siad time was an issue and the site would be basic but we could take the orders and payment was via paypal.
We had a number of complaints from customers regarding the site as many felt it was confusing. We also had issues with paypal.
At the end of December we recieved a invoice for an amount close to 3700 including VAT. They originally ommited the VAT in their original quote. The hosting cost had gone from £25 per annum to £50.
After recieving the bill I discusssed these issues with our neighbour. He said the project had taken them longer and we had only been billed for half the time they had worked on the project. He said the VAT was an error on their part but still sought the payment for it.
HE also said that the project was 2/3 complete.
Iasked about a content management system so that we could update the site our new page etc. He said it wasn't part of the spec and would cost extra. We took this for given and we updated our news on a weekly basis on our old site. He was happy because this was their first eccommrce site aand the experience gained would make it easier when it comes to thier next project.
He also mentioned that their houly rate had gon up from £25 to £30 (+VAT)
previously they had failed to mention VAT as above.
I feel we are paying for their learning curve and they have been unfair. We are held over a barrel as they are hosting our website on their servers. We feel stuck as we can ill afford to go over budget and wary if cost spiral as they encounter more problems with our web site.
Any advice would be graetly appreciated
James
cocoamountain. co. uk