PDA

View Full Version : Owner managed companies report a continued rise in the burden of Red Tape


Bishop Fleming Accountant
3rd November 2011, 13:00
Owner managed companies report a continued rise in the burden of Red Tape, despite successive Governments’ promise to cut those burdens.

More than half of owner-managed businesses (56%) saw the cost of handling Red Tape increase by more than £5,000 over the previous year, while more than a third (38%) of business owners now have to spend a day each week on dealing with Red Tape.

These are among the top line findings of the latest “Red Tape Watchdog” survey. Most regional business owners (56%) say that they are spending “significantly more time than a year ago” on handling Red Tape.

Despite Gordon Brown’s earlier promise to deliver a ‘bonfire of Red Tape’, and Vince Cable’s more recent promise to attack the welter of regulations, none of our survey respondents reported a reduction in the time or cost of handling Red Tape.

At a time when the Coalition Government has launched a debate on reducing employment tribunal pressures on employers, the majority of respondents (69%) identified employment regulations as the Red Tape that they would most like to see abolished or simplified.

Given the Government’s declared acknowledgement that Britain’s economic recovery depends on the ability of small companies to thrive and provide new jobs, this message is crucial. Those smaller companies, the core drivers of our national economy, do not have Human Resources departments to cope with the plethora of employment Red Tape.

Meanwhile, only a minority of businesses owners are adopting Vince Cable’s invitation to identify Red Tape items that should be abolished or changed.

Just 20% reported that they were already using the Government website to identify Red Tape items that should be changed, although almost half (44%) were still considering doing so.

This is a sad result. It is not often that the Government gives business-owners the opportunity to air their views on the biggest issue affecting their enterprise; but it probably reflects the lack of promotion of this consultation formula.

The fact remains that there has yet to be any reduction in the Red Tape burden borne by owner-managed businesses, upon whom the Government depends for the nation’s recovery and the creation of new jobs.

Those new jobs will not happen until the Government listens to employers and reduces the Red Tape burden.

Nuno
3rd November 2011, 13:28
It would be nice to know where your figures are from.

It sometimes seems to me that 'Red Tape' is a catchall phrase used to complain with. Just complain, not actually focus on any one thing, just have a bit of a whinge because things aren't going as well as planned. An excuse not to identify a problem and deal with it.
(Much the same is true of the 'PC gone mad' complaint. The vast majority of what is termed PC is in fact mere politeness, and the fact that it has to be enshrined in law shows how many rather unpleasant people there are out there.)

And it also strikes me that in this litigious age, if we got rid of a swathe of regulations, allowed a free for all in some sectors, then when something went wrong people would sue each other, with the vast expense, waste of resources, time and heartache that involves.

So perhaps, just perhaps, regulations and keeping up with regulations should be seen as a cost of business, and without them the alternative costs would be greater.

Mike tells it like it is
3rd November 2011, 13:32
It would be nice to know where your figures are from.

It sometimes seems to me that 'Red Tape' is a catchall phrase used to complain with. Just complain, not actually focus on any one thing, just have a bit of a whinge because things aren't going as well as planned. An excuse not to identify a problem and deal with it.
(Much the same is true of the 'PC gone mad' complaint. The vast majority of what is termed PC is in fact mere politeness, and the fact that it has to be enshrined in law shows how many rather unpleasant people there are out there.)

And it also strikes me that in this litigious age, if we got rid of a swathe of regulations, allowed a free for all in some sectors, then when something went wrong people would sue each other, with the vast expense, waste of resources, time and heartache that involves.

So perhaps, just perhaps, regulations and keeping up with regulations should be seen as a cost of business, and without them the alternative costs would be greater.

You could not be more wrong.

Bishop Fleming Accountant
3rd November 2011, 13:36
Hi Nuno,

I can't say where the figures are from as it was classed as an 'infraction' on of the rules! Ie: we conducted the survey, so this reference was stripped out.

I agree, regulation is needed, but the government has recognised that there is too much 'regulation' to the detriment of business and so they promised that something would be done, our responses say otherwise.

We'd be happy for you to take part in the next survey to share your views. If so, please email your name, business name and address to: advice@bishopfleming.co.uk stating: I would like to take part in the next 'Red Tape Watchdog' survey.

Nuno
3rd November 2011, 13:38
You could not be more wrong.
From you, I shall wear this as a badge of pride.

Paul Norman
3rd November 2011, 13:40
I am not so sure that there has been an increase of red-tape. I have noticed a significant increase in the level of precision with which existing rules are applied, and a notable level of aggression from the HMRC.

Like all business owners, I would not argue against a reduction in red-tape. However, I would differ from many by stating that I do not think red tape is hindering my business today.

In making this comment, I am interpreting red-tape as legislation, the compliance with which is causing me intrusive levels of additional work.