View Full Version : Quick Cash Loan
Just1709
4th April 2011, 20:01
Hi
I need some Quick Cash Loan with Poor Credit Score.
If you know some good refference company let me know please.
wizzard
7th April 2011, 21:55
If its only a small amount, you could apply for a "payday loan" with someone like the money shop.
pieterjons
9th June 2011, 10:51
Hi
I need some Quick Cash Loan with Poor Credit Score.
If you know some good refference company let me know please.
Just log on to lightpaydayloan.com , We offer a wide range of bad credit loans for your needs. Your financial situation is not a problem for us. We have many lenders waiting to approve your bad credit instantly. We can get you the loan you want, even if you have a bankruptcy. We have mortgage loans bad credit auto loan Bad, Bad Credit Personal Loans, Bad Credit, Quick Cash Loan with Poor Credit and much more.
fundingportal
9th June 2011, 11:30
Its almost as if the OP and Pierjons are the same person:)
Auto loans, now theres a term I haven't seen used in this country!
MASSEY
9th June 2011, 11:50
Just log on to lightpaydayloan.com , We offer a wide range of bad credit loans for your needs. Your financial situation is not a problem for us. We have many lenders waiting to approve your bad credit instantly. We can get you the loan you want, even if you have a bankruptcy. We have mortgage loans bad credit auto loan Bad, Bad Credit Personal Loans, Bad Credit, Quick Cash Loan with Poor Credit and much more.
You mean you flog their info on to the highest bidder?
ukdoorshop
9th June 2011, 11:56
Wonga is a great site for people with no credit rating!
paydayadvisor
30th June 2011, 10:58
You mean you flog their info on to the highest bidder?
highest US bidder, it's all in dollars :/
i would suggest popping along to my site to compare the loans, but we're not operational as of yet!
Wonga do credit check. WagedayAdvance are the only large scale payday lender to genuinely not include a credit check but the no credit check ones do cost more, £29.50 to be exact
I'd post a URL but I think I'd get told off for shameful self advertising
that's them, if this is actually what you're looking for great if not let me know and I can point you in the right direction. PM me if needed
Never borrow more than you can comfortably pay back!
sprouty
12th July 2011, 20:47
I use nextpayday.couk they are great and can accept early payments but manage your money well and don`t over stretch yourself. These sites are great but you need to keep on top of your finances
Nelson01
14th July 2011, 13:02
A payday loan is the option which u can consider it is easy to have and coneveinent also and u don’t have to wait fo a long to get this loan you should consider this it will be better at this point of time.
rale
23rd July 2011, 09:14
You have to pay interest for that borrowed amount. Usually the interest rate is outrageously high.
paydayadvisor
23rd July 2011, 10:45
You have to pay interest for that borrowed amount. Usually the interest rate is outrageously high.
no it isnt
Alan R Price
28th July 2011, 13:28
The minimum lending rate has been less than 1% p.a. for a number of years. Barclaycard Platinum Card is currently quoting 17.9%. Quoted APRs for Payday UK and wonga.com (for example) range from 1700% to 4200% p.a. No doubt forum users will form their own conclusions as to whether these rates are "outrageously high".
paydayadvisor
28th July 2011, 13:37
The minimum lending rate has been less than 1% p.a. for a number of years. Barclaycard Platinum Card is currently quoting 17.9%. Quoted APRs for Payday UK and wonga.com (for example) range from 1700% to 4200% p.a. No doubt forum users will form their own conclusions as to whether these rates are "outrageously high".
APR is only relative to the length of the loan
fundingportal
28th July 2011, 14:01
The minimum lending rate has been less than 1% p.a. for a number of years. Barclaycard Platinum Card is currently quoting 17.9%. Quoted APRs for Payday UK and wonga.com (for example) range from 1700% to 4200% p.a. No doubt forum users will form their own conclusions as to whether these rates are "outrageously high".
Hopefully intelligent forum users will form conclusions based on like-for-like comparison and opportunity cost, not on a spurious 'compared to base' comparison.
Alan R Price
28th July 2011, 15:49
Nobody would suggest that comparing the rates charged by lenders of last resort to MLR is sensible however the rates charged by credit card companies are generally considered fairly high and are easy to access for comparison. Granted, "payday" loans are high risk and deserve a higher reward. But is 100-200 times higher justifiable? I just ask the question. In the case of Kettley v Scott [1981], the court stated that consideration would be given to the prevailing interest rates at the time, the age and experience of the debtor, the risk involved and the degree of pressure brought upon the debtor. It would be interesting to see the attitude the court would take to a challenge to an APR of, for example, 1700% or 4,000%.
As for APRs, their use was adopted, if my memory serves me correctly, in the 1970s under the Consumer Credit Act to allow for a fair and reasonable comparison of interest rates for all types of borrowing and they take into account the amount lent, the interest rate, the period of the loan and the periodicity of the payments. There are standard methods of calculation which take all these factors into consideration for all types of lending. I do not understand the point made that "APR is only relative to the length of the loan". APRs are the legally acceptable method of comparison of the costs of credit.
My understanding of the term "opportunity cost" is "the cost of an alternative that must be forgone in order to pursue a certain action", so I am not really certain I understand the context in which it is used here. Do you mean the cost to the borrower of not borrowing the money compared to the cost of borrowing it? Or the cost to the lender of not lending it and using the money in some other way? Sorry if I'm being dim.
fundingportal
28th July 2011, 16:21
My principle point is that payday loans are typically taken out to cover a distress situation of (hopefully) a short term nature, so a direct comparison might well be approaching your bank for an overdraft - for this they would charge a fee (minimum £150) and might well add aditional costs. If the need for cash is, say £700 for a week then the cost of that overdraft will far exceed the cost of a payday loan, though on APR comparison the APR will be less. Alternatively it might mean missing credit card payments which will incur greater penalty charges.
if the need is repeated monthly then overdraft will almost certainly be cheaper.
There is, of course a very real chance that the bank will decline to help - in which case you can add the real cost of bounced cheques and additional charges to the opportunity cost (albeit not a very positive alternative) of the loss of goodwill and credibility of bounced payments and unpaid bills.
I have only a passing knowledge of this sector but I am aware that the the cost of running such an operation is disproportionately high (you can imagine the relative costs of distance-lending £700 for 7 days) which mean that rates have to be high to be commercially viable.
Which leaves the real question of whether the sector should exist?
Just a final point, but I would say that ANY price comparison is only ever valid once core needs are established.
MASSEY
28th July 2011, 16:58
You're all forgetting the point. Payday loans are for people with adverse credit. There is risk lending money to these people.
Why should the loan company not be compensated with a hefty return?
A highstreet bank would not loan to these people...
Alan R Price
29th July 2011, 09:21
As I say above ". . . "payday" loans are high risk and deserve a higher reward." The issue in question is whether an APR of 1700-4000% p.a. is justifiable, compared to the relatively expensive option of a credit card. Is the rate of default on payday loans really 100-200 times greater than on credit card debt? Judging by the number of consumer IVAs and bankruptcies, I doubt it.
The Moneylenders Act 1900 was the result, at least in part, of concern about lenders who charged 3,000% p.a. interest and while the legislation, which has evolved from there, has never sought to impose specific limits (each case on its own merits etc.) it is clear to me that the courts will look - and probably fairly soon - very carefully at loan agreements where the APR is in the rarefied atmosphere of four figures. It's about risk/reward and fairness.
paydayadvisor
29th July 2011, 09:31
As I say above ". . . "payday" loans are high risk and deserve a higher reward." The issue in question is whether an APR of 1700-4000% p.a. is justifiable, compared to the relatively expensive option of a credit card. Is the rate of default on payday loans really 100-200 times greater than on credit card debt? Judging by the number of consumer IVAs and bankruptcies, I doubt it.
Just to see if there has been a breakdown in understanding, let me ask you a question.
If you had a £100 debt on your credit card and paid it off a month or so after, how much would you expect to pay back?
Also, a £100 payday loan, how much would you expect to pay to repay that in full?
Alan R Price
29th July 2011, 15:35
Just to see if there has been a breakdown in understanding, let me ask you a question.
If you had a £100 debt on your credit card and paid it off a month or so after, how much would you expect to pay back?
Also, a £100 payday loan, how much would you expect to pay to repay that in full?
Sorry, I don't understand the relevance of the question.
paydayadvisor
29th July 2011, 15:55
Sorry, I don't understand the relevance of the question.
You're comparing payday loans and credit cards. These products have no relevance to each other.
The prices are only relative to the length of time they are taken over as stated previously
Alan R Price
2nd August 2011, 12:58
You're comparing payday loans and credit cards. These products have no relevance to each other.
The prices are only relative to the length of time they are taken over as stated previously
They are both readily available sources of consumer credit so of course they are relevant to each other and can be compared. Quite obviously (by definition) the amount of interest paid is a function of the duration of the loan and there is a statutory form of comparison of the cost - the APR - which takes into account all the variables. Although if I want to "borrow" £200 for a month from my credit card company, it doesn't cost me a penny!
There have been concerns about very high rates of interest for hundreds of years, hence the need for legislation to protect borrowers (and lenders). The proof of the pudding is in the eating however. Sooner or later the court will be asked to adjudicate.
paydayadvisor
2nd August 2011, 13:25
I think charging £50 on a £200 loan is very good when you consider the target market.
The typical customer for a payday loan wont be able to get a credit card etc.
If the lenders are strangled down to lower interest rates by the government, it will kill them.
Remember that not everyone pays back, and there is a lot of costs from the lender for staff/overhead etc.
The outrage is all about the APR which is IRRELEVANT on a short period loan.
I dont think short term lenders should have to show APR as it is a misleading figure for the consumer. Example rates would be better suited
Alan R Price
2nd August 2011, 14:32
I think charging £50 on a £200 loan is very good when you consider the target market.
The typical customer for a payday loan wont be able to get a credit card etc.
If the lenders are strangled down to lower interest rates by the government, it will kill them.
Remember that not everyone pays back, and there is a lot of costs from the lender for staff/overhead etc.
The outrage is all about the APR which is IRRELEVANT on a short period loan.
I dont think short term lenders should have to show APR as it is a misleading figure for the consumer. Example rates would be better suited
I am not denying that payday lenders should charge a premium. I just question whether £50 on a £200 loan is justifiable, given the duration of the loan and the comparative risk. Is the payday borrower really 100-200 times more of a risk than a credit card borrower?
I reiterate my point about APRs (and please don't SHOUT). They are the legal and proper way of comparing interest rates. The fact you don't like them doesn't mean they're not relevant - they just go to highlight how expensive payday loans are. Something can of course be expensive and good value for money; the question is whether payday loans are good VFM.
MASSEY
2nd August 2011, 14:37
I would say it's incorrect to suggest someone applying for a payday loan would not get a credit card, they might, it would be an apr of above 40% though.
Galmac618
9th August 2011, 10:31
If at all possible, avoid those loans! You will be paying and APR in excess of 2000%. Try get a credit card or something. You can get credit cards even with a poor credit history, although the APR is usually around the 40% mark, substantially lower than pay day loans. You should be able to withdraw cash on the card
MASSEY
9th August 2011, 11:57
If at all possible, avoid those loans! You will be paying and APR in excess of 2000%. Try get a credit card or something. You can get credit cards even with a poor credit history, although the APR is usually around the 40% mark, substantially lower than pay day loans. You should be able to withdraw cash on the card
You still have to wait for the pin and card in the post. Not exactly a QUICK LOAN.
Galmac618
9th August 2011, 12:06
You still have to wait for the pin and card in the post. Not exactly a QUICK LOAN.
Good point! I guess what I was trying to say is that Payday Loans are ridiculously expensive and should be avoided if at all possible.
Could a loan from friend/family/employer not be a possibility if its only very short term (you could then still apply for the credit card ;) )