Post's or Pages

[Zeal]

I don't suppose this makes a damn bit of difference, just double checking! :)

Posts VS Pages.

Posts = Tend to be for blogs.
Pages = well.. are pages.


There's a reason why I'm using posts even though it's not a blog, I can use them to link to pages or the category without it being a blog.

SEO terms, does google, bing + w/e else rank one higher then the other?

IF it did, I know it would only be the smallest difference. "Every something helps" someone once said :rolleyes:

[seo next]

I think you are talking about pages and posts in WP ?

If so, i don't think there would be a difference from google;s perspective as both are more or less same from code point of view..

[Zeal]

That's what I thought seonext - and yes.. wordpress :)

Just thought'd I'd double check though. Ta

[crossdaz]

That's what I thought seonext - and yes.. wordpress :)

Just thought'd I'd double check though. Ta

a post when published will ping google and be indexed immediately. A page won't and will be indexed when they feel like it.

Here's a good tip
http://yoast.com/articles/wordpress-seo/#pagesvsposts

[Zeal]

Pages it is.

However, the 2 main reason's he chose where:

1) The page had to be a daughter page of another page.... BUT - wp 3.x has the new custom menu.. meaning a post category can be a 'child' of a page instead.

2) he mentions 'comments destroy' - this isn't an issue.. comments are disabled.

[Coppock]

This could be complete nonense... however I've been looking at our results and find that pages rank better than posts... but that could just be coincidental and I can't 100% confirm without further tests or research.

[Zeal]

I've gone with pages anyway. Although the snippets are posts... the "view more" leads to a page. I guess pages may have the 'edge' over a longer period :)

All is fine now though :) Thanks :D