PDA

View Full Version : Innovation voucher for £3,000


Martin_s
19th May 2010, 11:04
How do I account for an innovation voucher?

The voucher is for £3k to be spent with any academic institution.

We have had the research done by a university and have now been invoiced.

The invoice shows:
Services £3,000+525(VAT)
- Innovation Voucher £3,000
= Payable of £525

I have no problem with the vat element but what do i do with the £3000 in my books? Do i just put R+D of £3,000 and contra it somewhere?

Zeno
19th May 2010, 11:07
I would show it as £3k in R & D (which I assume you are writing off to the P & L) and £3k of grants received.

David Griffiths
19th May 2010, 11:37
I wouldn't show it anywhere - in other words net off the voucher received against the money spent. Just enter the payment of £525 as £0 goods and £525 VAT

Martin_s
24th May 2010, 10:31
Thanks for taking the time to reply. Appreciated

Jaydee
24th May 2010, 10:42
I would not net it off, particularly if the outlay was true R+D, as you would be losing the benefit of the 150% tax break.

David Griffiths
24th May 2010, 11:30
I would not net it off, particularly if the outlay was true R+D, as you would be losing the benefit of the 150% tax break.

The Revenue's site here (http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/ct/forms-rates/claims/randd.htm) has this to say about subsidies:

Subsidies and grants

If your company or organisation has received a subsidy or grant for an R&D project, this may affect how much tax relief you can claim. If the subsidy or grant is a 'State aid' recognised by the European Commission, then you can't claim anything under the SME Scheme. For any other type of subsidy or grant, the R&D expenditure you can claim for is reduced by the amount of subsidy or grant received.

Zeno
24th May 2010, 15:25
I wouldn't show it anywhere

Why wouldn't you show it? (just curious)

For this sort of thing I would always tend to disclose on the face of the P & L even if it does come down to no effect. The company incurred R & D costs of £3,000 and they received grant funding of £3,000 (essentially) which to my mind are two separate transactions.

Unless you take the view that the company would not have commisioned the research if it were not being funded.

David Griffiths
24th May 2010, 16:52
Why wouldn't you show it? (just curious)
.

Because the company incurred no R&D costs, as they were paid by somebody else.