PDA

View Full Version : Improve your site ranking


freecybermag
11th January 2006, 12:10
Hey all.

I had this sent to my inbox and found it really useful so I'd thought I'd post it here.

If you have any further idea's let us know.

Cheers

Chris

Search Engine Optimization (SEO) can be the difference between a small, barely profitable or visible website and a traffic magnet website. There are a lot of ways, both good and bad, to influence the search engines. Some search engines react to certain strategies better than others. Some even have conflicting strategies that they react to. To document all of these things would require a significant number of pages and research that goes beyond the scope of this article.

However, there are a number of things that can be documented that will work for most if not all search engines. And let's face it; there are really only 3 that make a difference between a successful and an unsuccessful SEO strategy. They are the big three: Google, Yahoo and MSN. These three search engines in any given month are responsible for over 90% of all internet searches.

So, what is this article about? It's about what you can do as a website owner that will influence the search engines using commonly accepted practices of linking to other websites (outbound) and getting website links (inbound) back to you. There are basically 4 strategies that a website owner usually will employ to increase their website value in the eyes of the search engine. They are reciprocal linking, one-way linking, multi-site linking and directory linking. A website owner should not think that using just a single strategy is the right answer - sure it will help your SEO but it won't be the Best answer. The Best answer is to employ all 4 techniques and to do it naturally.

Each of the four linking strategies has specific descriptions that can be summed up as: 1. Reciprocal Linking = Site A links to Site B, Site B links back to Site A 2. One-Way Linking = Site B links to Site A 3. Multi-Site Linking = Site A links to Site B, Site B links to Site C, Site C links to Site D, and Site D links back to Site A. Could be 3..N number of sites involved. 4. Directory Linking = Site Directory A links to Site A

That seems simple enough but it takes time and effort to perform all 4 strategies and most website owners aren't willing to spend the time or don't have the time to spend on it. As a website owner, SEO needs to be one of the highest priority tasks that you need to address, just after Order Processing and Fulfillment and Customer Service. Without free traffic from the search engines, other traffic generation strategies that usually require payment must be engaged.

Now doing the 4 strategies above is great, but it gets even harder because you have to do it in a way that doesn't trigger the search engines to enforce a penalty upon your website. No one except the search engine engineers know all of the exact penalties but we have some good theories for some of them.

The first is the rate at which links are created. There is a certain threshold for creating links that is too fast. It's possible that the threshold is a sliding scale and is related to the age of the website according to the engine. For example, a young low-traffic website should not normally be getting 1000 links a month whereas an older website that gets a lot of traffic could be OK to get 1000 links a month. As you progress in your linking strategies make sure you keep this in mind, especially if you are thinking about buying links.

The second is that having a link to every site that links to you will likely reduce the value of the links. In other words, if all you ever get is Reciprocal Linking, you will likely move up the SERP's (Search Engine Results Page's) but you won't reach your sites full potential. Having a mixture of all 4 strategies will appear more natural to the engines.

The third is having all inbound links to your site on "linking" pages will make those links less valuable than having a natural link on a contextually relative page for a percentage of the inbound links. The higher you can drive this context percentage, the better your website will rank. These types of links are often some of the most difficult links to generate an exchange for because it requires more time and effort for both website owners.

The fourth is to have links inbound from all different ranking sites. If all you have linking to you is page rank 6 and 7 sites then you are likely to be sending the message that you purchased your links and that is not natural to the engines. Some would argue that purchasing links for driving traffic is just fine and it is. However, you should not expect the search engines to give those inbound links very much weight when calculating your SERP positions. It is significantly more natural for you to have a large number of rank 1 and 2 inbound links and a decreasing number of inbound links as you move up the page rank scale (0 - 10).

The fifth is to have the text of you inbound links varied. It isn't natural to have every website that links to you to have the same text on the link description. The natural tendency would be to have a certain percent be the sites name, but after that it should be a wide variety of description. Your link text description is a key factor for how your site/page will rank, so make sure that you keep that in mind as you specify your preferred link text description on your website.

Finally, it would be best for a good percentage of your inbound links to appear within the text of a page that appears natural for the reader of that site. And for those links to not all point back to the home page of your website. It's most natural for a good high quality link to appear in the text of a page and have it point internally within your site.

So, when you begin or continue your SEO activities keep all of these things in mind and don't be impatient. Impatience could incur penalties or worse. Your website could end up in the "sandbox". It is rumored and becoming more concrete that Google supposedly uses a sandbox that questionable sites are put in until they have aged to a point that Google no longer feels that they are being manipulated. Many of the search engines use similar protection schemes to eliminate spam sites and manipulation sites to keep their SERP's from being cluttered.

mattk
11th January 2006, 12:41
This dropped into my inbox yesterday:

"Andrew Allfrey is business development Director and CEO of e-Prominence Limited, a Scottish search engine optimisation and pay per click specialist. Andrew has over 6 years experience within the search industry and offers ethical search marketing advice and services to a wide range of clients nationwide. For more information visit (http://www.e-prominence.co.uk) www.e-prominence.co.uk.

What are the most important elements of on-site or on-page optimisation?

Although there are a wide variety of different factors that come into play to produce a well optimised and search engine friendly website the most important aspects have to be:

• Creating quality content for your visitors

The old adage of “content is king” is even more important when developing a search engine friendly website.

• Ensuring that a website is easily navigable.

Make your site easy to navigate by both the search engines and your visitors. Always include a descriptive ‘Site Map’ rather than just a series of links. Provide real information that helps the user and the search engines determine what the link is about.

• Creating effective, descriptive page titles.

This is the most important ranking factor for Google in terms of on-site optimisation and it’s therefore crucial to invest time in developing effective page titles.

• Ensure that your website is updated regularly.

Google loves regularly updated websites. Updated content could include ‘Press Releases’ and try to archive any newsletters. Implement an RSS feed if possible, giving people the option to subscribe to either a newsletter or the RSS feed.

Unfortunately just having a well optimised site isn’t enough these days. The search engines determined some time ago that what people say on their website, isn’t necessarily an accurate reflection of what that company actually does. ‘Keyword Stuffing’ was very common in the early days. To counter this problem the search engines had to act and so I would suggest that on-site optimisation only accounts for about 15 to 20% of search optimisation now.

What about off-site or off-page optimisation?

As I mentioned in the previous section on-page factors carry bare very little weight compared to off-page factors in determining a websites ranking. The most important factors in terms of off-site optimisation are:

• Obtaining relevant incoming links from authority and industry relevant websites

The best way to achieve this is to write good quality content and to provide a service, product or tool that other relevant websites’ visitors can benefit from. In time sites will link to your site because they want to provide additional benefits for their own visitors.

• Developing your site’s external profile

It’s important to try and achieve the status of an authority site and develop your websites external profile. The best way to achieve this is to act like an authority site. Writing articles and providing your visitors with information that will help get your site noticed is a good way to achieve this. Consider the issue of well optimised, monthly Press Releases. The implementation of an RSS feed can be useful here at making your products and services known to your target audience.

Is link quality more important than link quantity?

The recent update at Google, codenamed ‘Jagger’, caused huge upset within the search community especially for sites that relied heavily on reciprocal links. Google updated its algorithm to try and prevent continuing abuse and now gives little weight on reciprocal links for ranking purposes.

Incoming link quality has always been far more important than the number of links. After the last Google update most reciprocal links will not be considered by Google and although non relevant links won’t damage your site they won’t help much either. Quality incoming links from authority sites is the way forward. Five links from authority sites will achieve a better result than 500 links from dubious or irrelevant websites, and this is one of the key elements used by the search engines to determine a site’s ranking."

The article then tails off in my opinion, but you can read the full thing here:

E-consultancy (http://www.e-consultancy.com/newsfeatures/newsletter/2392/andrew-allfrey-on-seo-the-e-consultancy-interview.html#24527)

Tayads
20th March 2006, 20:25
All of the above is perfectly good advice and one thing we continually come across is keyword stuffing in the keywords tag.
Whilst many have dropped the meta tags it is still recommended to have them on your pages.
I have found the tags as a lie detector test for the engines. Sites that have loads of 'wanna be found for content' performs worse than sites that has 'can be found for content'. The bottom line here is don't dilute the tags by putting in keywords that are not within the text of the page.
Also make sure that the tags reflect each page. How many times have we seen the exact same tags on every page of a site.
Use the title tag to the max. Put in a keyword rich title and not 'Welcome to our web site'.

Get the basics right and the rest will give results.

A new area is RSS Feeds. Since we placed our own feed on the site the RSS bots, yes there are dedicated bots that scan for feed content, have been devouring our content and our rankings have improved. One shock result is where feeds we have built for our clients are now ranking well above the clients web site.
As the feeds are hosted on a different server the links in the feed are counting as a high value inbound non-reciprocol link.

RSS Feeds are a great way to get new content indexed fast or even getting pages that are not showing in the SERPS to get indexed by the bots.

One point about having feed content from other feeds on your own site. This will be seen as duplicate content and may not give you a boost up the rankings that you may want. Best to do the work and develop your own content and put it in a feed to give the bots and people a good reason to keep coming back.

click2britain
21st March 2006, 10:16
Hi,

The summary is from above all discussions, "Contenet is the King & Link is the Queen" as always:)

RahXephon
21st March 2007, 15:20
Thanks a lot for your knowledge and who can go further that how long we will receive pagerank for a new website and how to get it soon?

Sue Lawrence
7th March 2008, 18:55
I have the same question. My site is about 3 months old and has a rank of 0. I've heard of something called the Google sandbox for new sites. Does it really exist?

Regards,

Sue

sirearl
7th March 2008, 21:23
Hi,

The summary is from above all discussions, "Contenet is the King & Link is the Queen" as always:)

OK try this

SEO is the Tank

Content is The Crew

Links are The fuel Supply

Earl

RedEvo
7th March 2008, 21:53
I have the same question. My site is about 3 months old and has a rank of 0. I've heard of something called the Google sandbox for new sites. Does it really exist?

Regards,

Sue

Pages NOT sites get PageRank.

d

beadell
7th March 2008, 22:42
OK try this

SEO is the Tank

Content is The Crew

Links are The fuel Supply

Earl

So what would be the ammunition??

Sue Lawrence
8th March 2008, 08:14
One thing I wonder about is how much the domain name itself counts towards ranking?

If Google ranks pages not sites then is the url of the page the most important thing?

Sue

RedEvo
8th March 2008, 08:58
Google suggests there are over 200 factors involved in a ranking decision. Domain age is suggested as one and domain name could be if it contains keywords.

Make sure your are covering SEO Basics (http://seo.redevolution.com/the-starter-for-ten-post/) and you will at least be heading in the right direction. You might also want to consider your linking strategy (http://seo.redevolution.com/linking/).

d

Sue Lawrence
8th March 2008, 09:45
Thanks,

I'll do some more research.

sirearl
8th March 2008, 09:57
So what would be the ammunition??


good point.I would of course.:eek:

Earl

Web Design Liverpool
13th August 2008, 16:07
Some keyword domain names are selected for branding purposes, forms of advertising now regularly include URLs/domains for marketing sites. The names are selected to be as easy to remember as possible, and that entails using keywords that are meaningful to the pages within the sites.

However the domain is not the most important factor, the combination of incoming links, on-page content optimising and relavant page content determine search engine results more than a keyword specific name.

mcol
4th September 2008, 13:33
have to disagree here.

IMHO an exact match domain name e.g. bluewidgets.co.uk is the single most important factor in Google by a mile, and all things being equal will generally outrank a site with far superior SEO.

safetynut
4th October 2008, 15:53
A very Interesting post


Sites Placed Above Mine = SPAM

just something i've picked up

OldWelshGuy
4th October 2008, 16:27
have to disagree here.

IMHO an exact match domain name e.g. bluewidgets.co.uk is the single most important factor in Google by a mile, and all things being equal will generally outrank a site with far superior SEO.

prove it. You have stated this, so prove it. Because I think you will find that the reason a site using a LW rich domain ranks is because of the anchor text all links pointing to it automatically use. Now I might be wrong, but last time i looked, anchor text rich links was part of SEo, so how can your statement be correct when it contradicts itself?

ken_uk
4th October 2008, 16:52
I just hate it when SEO's spam me.

Shows a total lack of ethics if they are bulk mailing sites, with press releases or offers to work on a site.

Dont mind if I signed up for emails from them, but when they send out of the blue, its a big warning sign they are rubbish.

bakat
4th October 2008, 17:06
Wow.. nice infos. thanks. Also from my experience Yahoo prefers more to keywords will Google more to unique content and both love backlinks but google like backlinks from niche related sites.

DRB
20th February 2009, 11:06
Thanks a lot for your knowledge and who can go further that how long we will receive pagerank for a new website and how to get it soon?

For a new website it can take upto 2-3 months. It depends on the content quality and the internal links also. I started a project i got page rank of 2 within 2 months.

zookx
20th February 2009, 11:31
I have the same question. My site is about 3 months old and has a rank of 0. I've heard of something called the Google sandbox for new sites. Does it really exist?

Regards,

Sue

The last couple of Google page rank updates have been about quarterly, so I wouldn't worry about this specifically.

As said before, concentrate on good content on your site and attracting as many relevant links to your site as you can.