fastfences
22nd December 2005, 18:14
Hi all.
I have just printed off my awards on 120gsm parchment and admire them, albeit in a state of despondency.
I should be truly appreciative of receiving your votes; but the message is somewhat clouded. Most Sarcastic? Most Imaginative?
I sit here on the threshold of depression, :( :( wondering if I am taken seriously, or if I'm just totally misunderstood. :cry: I mean, 'Most Sarcastic?' Is not sarcasm offering a double or hidden meaning? Why would you all choose to think that I am operating in some sort of warped, twisted :twisted: and demeaning manner? Okay. So I have made one or two (at the most) tiny quips against members. I think only yesterday I motioned about the merits of Worm being snuggled up with Claire, and alluded to the prospect of me being happy to do similar. Well, the real explanation is that I was rewarding Claire for her maternal, nurturing nature in favour of Worm and that I would feel similarly rewarded if I were nurtured by her kind self. It most certainly had nothing to do with slipping between the sheets and getting it on, as seems to be the unfortunate interpretation. :?
And imaginative? Can one not tell of life's experiences without a cloud of curiosity or disbelief hovering above? And Chris speaks of Lucinda as if he knew her!! How hypocritical and a total lie. Her? Who ever said it was 'her'? Not I. Chris never, ever met Latex Lionel! But if I'm rewarded for the likes of my 'interview' with JoyDivision:
http://www.ukbusinessforums.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=7103&highlight=interview+joydivision I will happily accept accolades.
Now, I think I'll go and do some 'serious' posting! :wink:
Cheers and congratulations to other winners!
Nigel
I have just printed off my awards on 120gsm parchment and admire them, albeit in a state of despondency.
I should be truly appreciative of receiving your votes; but the message is somewhat clouded. Most Sarcastic? Most Imaginative?
I sit here on the threshold of depression, :( :( wondering if I am taken seriously, or if I'm just totally misunderstood. :cry: I mean, 'Most Sarcastic?' Is not sarcasm offering a double or hidden meaning? Why would you all choose to think that I am operating in some sort of warped, twisted :twisted: and demeaning manner? Okay. So I have made one or two (at the most) tiny quips against members. I think only yesterday I motioned about the merits of Worm being snuggled up with Claire, and alluded to the prospect of me being happy to do similar. Well, the real explanation is that I was rewarding Claire for her maternal, nurturing nature in favour of Worm and that I would feel similarly rewarded if I were nurtured by her kind self. It most certainly had nothing to do with slipping between the sheets and getting it on, as seems to be the unfortunate interpretation. :?
And imaginative? Can one not tell of life's experiences without a cloud of curiosity or disbelief hovering above? And Chris speaks of Lucinda as if he knew her!! How hypocritical and a total lie. Her? Who ever said it was 'her'? Not I. Chris never, ever met Latex Lionel! But if I'm rewarded for the likes of my 'interview' with JoyDivision:
http://www.ukbusinessforums.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=7103&highlight=interview+joydivision I will happily accept accolades.
Now, I think I'll go and do some 'serious' posting! :wink:
Cheers and congratulations to other winners!
Nigel