PDA

View Full Version : Directory Submissions - Waste of Time?


directmarketingadvice
20th April 2009, 10:02
I got an email from Jerry West saying "Most directories aren't worth the time to submit to" and linking to his article:

http://www.webmarketingnow.com/tips/directories-recommended.html

Aside from Dmoz - which is rarely updated - they're all paid directories.

Are free directories almost all a waste of time?

(except stuff like freeindex which gets lots of p1 rankings and can provide traffic)

Thoughts?

Steve

fisicx
20th April 2009, 10:53
Remember the good old google adage: 'build sites for people not for the search engines'.

It's the same with directories, if you feel a directory listing will be useful for people then it's not going to hurt. But spending hours and hours submitting to all the free directories you can find is a waste of time. All you are going to get two lines of promo and a link along with all the hundreds of others all doing the same thing. The number of visitors you will get from these directories is going to be negliable so no advantage there. Equally, google will view the directory and consider if it adds value to the visitor, if the answer is no then the link juice that passes is going to be negligable. And even worse if google notes that you have submitted to hundreds or thousands of spammy directories then you could even end up going backwards.

Subbynet
20th April 2009, 11:21
Both paid and free directories are spammy... Why paying for a spammy link is better than a free spammy link I don't know - it doesn't really make sense.

Ultimately its not really worth targeting directories anyway, you don't gain much traffic even from the "better ones".

DanHarrison
20th April 2009, 12:02
Sometimes it's worth targeting well-managed directories that are in your niche. For example, I run one in the green niche (www.bigecodirectory.com). But I run the directory to help others find green related sites, not for backlinks.

Dan

AndyBlack
20th April 2009, 12:18
A link is a link, but really.... any value these links have are of very little value. They're just sites which house a ton of outbound links, many of which are spammy and keyword heavy.

YODspica
20th April 2009, 12:52
agree with latest posts.

SEO Positive
20th April 2009, 16:21
I actually think that directory submissions are well worth doing, and links from directories will help your optimisation campaign.

Here is a link to the top 100 directories according to the info vilesilencer website.

http://info.vilesilencer.com/top (http://info.vilesilencer.com/top)

Hope this helps.

OldWelshGuy
20th April 2009, 18:03
There is a simple system for finding directories that are worthwhile submitting to, I use it, and it works. getting listed in lots of lower quality directories also masks your high quality links from your competition ;)

thebookiesoffers
20th April 2009, 18:47
There is a simple system for finding directories that are worthwhile submitting to, I use it, and it works. getting listed in lots of lower quality directories also masks your high quality links from your competition ;)

any chance of pointing us in the right direction please mate?

An Oasis
20th April 2009, 19:21
There is a simple system for finding directories that are worthwhile submitting to, I use it, and it works. getting listed in lots of lower quality directories also masks your high quality links from your competition ;)

LOL very good, you get the tart of the day badge!:D

UKSEOAgency
20th April 2009, 23:36
I have worked with an awful lot of directory submission companies - and to date have only found one company which provides us with a great service, time and time again - but the directories are as relevent as possible and do provide some traffic (stats show its around 2% of my sites overall traffic)

However there are a lot of companies out there which provide the poorest of poor quality directories and make me want to cry about wasted money. Luckily it was on test sites and not clients sites.

SEO Positive
21st April 2009, 06:41
Which one was the good one?

An Oasis
21st April 2009, 06:45
I’ve been tracking some directories for about the last 12 months and one of the biggest issues seems to be that a huge % of them set off with good intentions and indeed do quite well but then fade into obscurity. The RIO for directory inclusion is in the main very poor.

That said I’ve never bothered going for inclusion in the larger directories, with the exception of a Dmoz entry, which brings in no traffic whatsoever.

Kneoteric_eSolutions
21st April 2009, 07:18
...getting listed in lots of lower quality directories also masks your high quality links from your competition ;)

Decoy. Never thought of it from that perspective. You always have something different to say.

SEO Positive
21st April 2009, 07:22
Oasis,

That is a good point to make.

fisicx
21st April 2009, 07:52
Decoy. Never thought of it from that perspective. You always have something different to say.

Decoys are fun, try adding lots of poorly converting keywords in your meta tags.

sirearl
21st April 2009, 08:31
Any visitor that buys is a good one.

Who cares where they come from.

Earl

driansmith
24th April 2009, 18:20
Aside from Dmoz - which is rarely updated - they're all paid directories.

Are free directories almost all a waste of time?


My view is that all directories can have a positive effect, its a matter of whether you have the time/budget to submit to them.

PrettyPaws
24th April 2009, 18:43
Any visitor that buys is a good one.

Who cares where they come from.

Earl

Disagree, ones why buy something, returns it damaged and expect a full refund are not good. I could live without them :rolleyes:

driansmith
24th April 2009, 18:48
Que? I do not understand.

PrettyPaws
24th April 2009, 19:04
Disagree, ones who buy something, return it damaged and expect a full refund are not good. I could live without them :rolleyes:

That's what I ment

iyereoboite
25th April 2009, 21:19
Wow. Im quite disheartened by the comments im reading about directories being a waste of time. I just finished making a uk business directory website and to see al the negative comments makes me feel like i was wasting my time. I should have gone to my lectures instead.

The site is directlisted com -

When i made the site i made it with the businesses in mind. It wasnt meant to be a waste of time for businesses and its free and its being constantly updated. Yell is a good directory, so is gum tree

BdTS
26th April 2009, 12:39
Again though, many people making what they think are qualified assessments based upon the results they achieve with a free-line entry.

Most directories will go out their way to make sure that you DON'T get new work from your free-line entry.

Freeindex and UKSMD are the only exceptions I'm aware of.

driansmith
26th April 2009, 14:07
I’ve been tracking some directories for about the last 12 months and one of the biggest issues seems to be that a huge % of them set off with good intentions and indeed do quite well but then fade into obscurity. The RIO for directory inclusion is in the main very poor.

That said I’ve never bothered going for inclusion in the larger directories, with the exception of a Dmoz entry, which brings in no traffic whatsoever.

I would make the following observations:

1. I agree with the point about directories disappearing into obscurity. However, some of them go on to bigger and better things. You do not know which are which when they start, but if you are submitted to all then you need not worry.
2. DMOZ sends me a lot of regular traffic, and I do get a steady stream from a wide variety of lesser directories.

Overall, I would recommend using these directories as part of your link-building/marketing strategy.

Maslins
26th April 2009, 20:00
Noob here so be nice. Yell.com has PR7 from what I've seen, and I think paying £90 will get me a link from them for a year.

If this then counts as a really high value link & makes me appear much higher in Google it's perhaps worth the £90...will it?

Maslins
26th April 2009, 20:01
soz, double post

thebookiesoffers
26th April 2009, 20:46
Noob here so be nice. Yell.com has PR7 from what I've seen, and I think paying £90 will get me a link from them for a year.

If this then counts as a really high value link & makes me appear much higher in Google it's perhaps worth the £90...will it?

what you have to remember is the PR7 is on the homepage and not the page your link will be. But what you have to think off is the £90 going to repay itself by you being on Yell. For example, if you get one sale in your first moth that is £100 then job done, its paid for itself. I know i've probably single handed paid for my local chinesse's listing this year on yell:eek::D

Coderea
27th April 2009, 07:41
Most of the directories would count as supplement results in google and might effect the rankings..but some are important and is good to index your new site..
Don't go for 1000 directories submission in a week..no point..but it's better to submit to few of them and you are good to go..!
Our guys do directory submissions for our clients but we make sure that we are not submitting to junk directories..like in .ws or .info ones..Sorry but these sites are nowhere to stay long term.

fisicx
27th April 2009, 08:01
Noob here so be nice. Yell.com has PR7 from what I've seen, and I think paying £90 will get me a link from them for a year.

If this then counts as a really high value link & makes me appear much higher in Google it's perhaps worth the £90...will it?

Won't make the slightest bit of difference. All outbound links from Yell are no-follow which means they will be ignored by Google.

fisicx
27th April 2009, 08:08
Wow. Im quite disheartened by the comments im reading about directories being a waste of time. I just finished making a uk business directory website and to see al the negative comments makes me feel like i was wasting my time. I should have gone to my lectures instead.

How often do you use a directory to search for a product or service? I suspect then most of the time you use a search engine. Your site is just one of hundreds if not thousands of directories and as a result will just get filed in the Google dump of low value clones. The search engines want to see sites that offer something unique and new, full of informative and interesting content not just another directory.

driansmith
27th April 2009, 09:33
Won't make the slightest bit of difference. All outbound links from Yell are no-follow which means they will be ignored by Google.

I agree. And I have never had a client that has had a positive response to these listings on Yell. But, I would be interested to hear of anyone who has/does experienced value-for-money.

BdTS
27th April 2009, 12:50
drian,

I've had plenty, equally, some bad ones as well.

Depends on the product and in particular, the coverage a client takes out with a directory.

It's more often than not a waste of money to go on with the cheapest product.

BdTS
27th April 2009, 12:50
....and I'm still lost as to the importance of no-follows on Google.

Yell optimise their advertisers, and most of Yell's traffic comes to them directly anyway so not sure what the issue is.

driansmith
27th April 2009, 12:55
drian,

I've had plenty, equally, some bad ones as well.

Depends on the product and in particular, the coverage a client takes out with a directory.

It's more often than not a waste of money to go on with the cheapest product.

Would you be willing to explain a little further? I would like to be a little clearer in my own mind when it might be worthwhile to go with Yell.

driansmith
27th April 2009, 12:57
....and I'm still lost as to the importance of no-follows on Google.


Sorry BdTS, which aspect of 'no-follows' are you unclear on?

fisicx
27th April 2009, 13:05
....and I'm still lost as to the importance of no-follows on Google.

Maslins was under the impression that the Yell link would be a good inbound link and may help their ranking. A no-follow attribute tells Google to ignore the link.

It's got nothing to do with the use of the directory or the traffic it generates for your site.

driansmith
27th April 2009, 13:12
Gotya! I agree. Thanks.

SEO Positive
27th April 2009, 13:29
Although I did say earlier in this thread that directory links are (in my opinion) good links to gain (in general). There are directories that I would not waste my time with.

For example - Thompson, Yell, ETC, ETC, as these links will do almost nothing for your rankings.

fisicx
27th April 2009, 13:33
For example - Thompson, Yell, ETC, ETC, as these links will do almost nothing for your rankings.

On the other hand, if these directories bring some good quality traffic that converts well then there is a definate finacial advantage to these listing.

It's not about links and ranking, it's about making money.

SEO Positive
27th April 2009, 13:56
Have you ever had an advert in these directories?

I know personally (again, from my experience) that no business comes from them.

BdTS
27th April 2009, 14:16
Have you ever had an advert in these directories?

I know personally (again, from my experience) that no business comes from them.



No business came for you. That doesn't mean they don't work.

That's what I've been referring to in my thread about FLE's, you simply cannot tell someone in a different trade and classification from yourself that a directory does or doesn't work, it's really up to the person themselves to measure this and find out stats from whichever directory it is.

fisicx
27th April 2009, 14:28
Have you ever had an advert in these directories?

I know personally (again, from my experience) that no business comes from them.

I know a couple of people who get quite a bit of work through yell and others who have never had a sniff. As suggested, it's very niche orientated. I personally wouldn't bother but that doesn't means you should write it off for everyone.

SEO Positive
27th April 2009, 14:44
That is why I said "from my experience"