View Full Version : Website update
Desmond Brambley
9th July 2005, 17:21
Just thought I'd let you know we have rebranded the website, and would like to invite you to take a look.
Many thanks in advance.
epiphany
9th July 2005, 21:04
Do you want feedback? :)
creative-keyrings
9th July 2005, 21:06
Hey Their,
It looks a really clean site. The only downside to it is the logo on the right of each of the pages with a little animation, it simply looks out of place and doesn't go with the design.
Apart from that you have done a good job! Well Done :)
Whistle Ink
10th July 2005, 09:26
Hi,
it looks alright. the middle bit of the logo/ cmpany name graphic doesnt load. I don't think the site looks likes the excellent work you must do - its not creative enough for me.
An improvement on the irst though.
Webstuff
10th July 2005, 10:25
Would it look better with a
body { padding:0; margin:0; }
? That would let your buttons cling snugly to the edge of the page. Also, don't forget:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
It's really important! (Sorry, but it really is.)
fastfences
10th July 2005, 11:21
And the waterfall's too fast! Great contribution I know, but sometimes what one sees, another doesn't.
cheers & good luck!
Desmond Brambley
10th July 2005, 16:08
And the waterfall's too fast! Great contribution I know, but sometimes what one sees, another doesn't.
cheers & good luck!
Sorry about that, I did write to God before filming, but He didn't write back in time, and as you see, He didn't turn the speed of the river down...
Webstuff
11th July 2005, 11:34
lol, do I detect a note of sarcasm?
fastfences
11th July 2005, 19:26
It's ok, I can take it. Like I said, seems trivial, but in the pursuit of perfection, God does sometimes overlook a few things; and it then falls upon us to take over His work.
I'm no authority though, You could pick many 'holes' in my site - I was just offering a viewpoint.
See ya
Desmond Brambley
11th July 2005, 19:27
I'm just not sure what you mean, fastfences.
Do you think I should slow-mo it? Is it a bit hectic and distracting?
Rob Holmes
11th July 2005, 19:36
Desmond,
For me it 'freezes' temporarily as it loops
Rob
Desmond Brambley
11th July 2005, 19:40
Ooo, bummer.
I'm seriously thinking of ditching it anyway, and Rob, you've just made my mind up. I know what I'm doing in the morning!
Ta! :-)
epiphany
11th July 2005, 21:49
He just means that the water is moving faster than it would do in real life which means the gif animation needs more time in between each frame in order to make it look nicer :)
Desmond Brambley
12th July 2005, 07:55
Ahh, trouble is, that is at real life speed.
The water running there is running at normal speed for that river (which is in Wales).
The SWF animation has a base rate of 25 frames per second, the same as the DV video I took it from, which I shot on location.